THE BASIC EDUCATION PS MUST NO DOWNPLAY THE IMMENSITY OF CORRUPTION IN THE MINISTRY.

Dear Sir/Madam,

“Touch the raw fruit and you will be shown the ripe one” so goes a Bukusu dictum. It literally means that in the process of looking for information on culpability, the investigator(s) may inadvertently stumble upon something that may just propel a suspect to spill the beans. This is exactly what the public and the mainstream media has made Professor Karega Mutahi, the Basic Education PS to do. In a terse but revealing press release (Standard Newspaper, Monday 28th December 2009) titled “We remain steadfast to offering quality free education”, the jolly old Professor wonders loudly why the mainstream media and the public are collectively talking about the “wrong type of corruption in his ministry.”He convincingly reiterates that there is no scandal touching on the FPE.

He however, albeit reluctantly, admits to the existence of some mild form of corruption in other section(s) of the Kenya Education Sector Support Programme (KESSP), presumably in the capacity building component where an official reportedly misused 5.5 million shillings while about fifteen others are alleged to have forged receipts. This, the PS affirms, is the “correct type of corruption” docking in his ministry.

Any other type of corruption, according to the PS is at best, a figment of one`s imagination. That is why he is accusing the mainstream media and the public alike for either maligning him and the Minister for basic Education or deliberately misunderstanding a “mischievously leaked KESSP audit report.”However, this is in itself, the Belt away credence that the PS is himself “mischievously adapting the facts to fit the cause that he presently cares for; that of throwing the public and KACC off -balance from the goings- on in his ministry.

You see none other than the President himself ordered for investigations into allegations of possible misappropriation and embezzlement of the FPE funds. For the PS to come out guns blazing, at this point in time, is not only disrespectful of the President`s directive but also irresponsible as well as pre –judicial. It would increasingly appear as if the PS is hell- bent on being a permanent obstacle in KACC`s investigation; the more reasons why he must step aside.

Suffice to say that corruption whether in FPE (which is also a component of KESSP) or in other components of KESSP, directly jeopardizes the future of the Kenyan children. It therefore baffles many that a person of the stature of the PS appears to be downplaying the immensity of the criminal engagements in the Ministry. In so doing he risks being seen not only to be institutionalizing but also impiously buttressing the cancerous problem.

When he, characteristic of himself, adopts an aim of indifference by brazenly talking about a “mischievously leaked report” he is obviously trying to politicize the scandal yet this should be far from the case. Politicization of this issue will not by any chance sanitize the muck in the ministry.

Furthermore, the PS has not yet proved himself equal to the severe task of jealously guarding the resources of the public under his watch. This is because he is apparently oblivious of the avalanche of evidence on corruption currently surrounding KESSP`s vote head on Infrastructure Development and Procurement of Science Equipment in schools across the country. The evidence is there for all and sundry. For example, when some principals and head teachers in secondary and primary schools respectively learnt that KACC had hit the ground running, they, out of fear of incrimination, alleged that they were forced to play ball by corrupt officials from the Ministry of basic Education. At least one bold legislator from the larger Bungoma District is on record saying that he has written to the Ministry of Basic Education regarding this scandal.

It is an open secret that the selection of schools to benefit from this grant is not dependent on any transparently laid down criteria but on the affinity to corruption by the various school heads. The more corrupt a school head is the more “assistance” his or her school gets and so do kickbacks thrive.

With as little as ten percent of the total allocation per school, auditors from the ministry of basic education will give any school a clean Bill of health even though very little or none of the money will be used in the target project. So massive is the corruption tentacles that anyone who dares stand on its way is severely dealt with. I for instance, was at one time interdicted and suspended from service for writing to the PS to inform him of this cancerous corruption in schools.

This is how unashamedly officials at the Ministry`s Headquarters and corrupt Heads of schools connive to auction the future of the Kenyan children. Little of Infrastructure Development and Procurement of Equipment takes place in schools. Yet it is a fact that quality education can only be realized when schools have the necessary infrastructure and adequate science equipment to meet the rising demands of the curriculum.

The PS must know that it does not help to appear as though he thinks that the media and the public are a “pack of fools at the wrong place at the same time.” Rather, the PS needs to develop an Efficient Management Information System (EMIS) to run the ministry professionally so that he can secure the future of the Kenyan children and of course the future of the nation at large.

The PS more than anybody else must be worried of the recent startling research finding that states that more and more Kenyan people are more than likely to be dimwits in future. Corruption and mismanagement in the education sector more than anything else provides a fertile ground for the realization of this chilling scenario.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

ARREST OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS: WE MUST SY NO TO THE DIABOLICAL CONSPIRATORY ACTS OF THUGGERY BEING PERPETUATED BY THE FORCES OF SADISM.

Dear Sir/Madam,

The availability of cogent democratic structures constitutes fringes of a responsible democratic culture. These structures are cognizant of the freedoms of association and expression as is spelt out in the constitution.

The citizens have only to inform the law enforcers of their need to carry out a demonstration. The police do not constitutionally issue any license for such an activity as they have alleged ad infinitum; rather they are in fact constitutionally expected to provide security to the demonstrators. Granted, arrests can be made by the police if the demonstrators, in the course of the demonstration, pose a serious threat to the liberties of other citizens. This may include acts of vandalism, theft and cause of actual bodily harm to peaceful citizens. But even then, it is only those who actually participate in this infringement that must be arrested and prosecuted. None of the cases above have been quoted as reasons for their arrest and detention.

It would thus be preposterous if the arrest and detention of the human rights activists is in any way remotely connected with breach of a nebulous ministerial directive on noise pollution. This would be a diabolical conspiratory act of thuggery being perpetrated by the forces of sadism.

To say that the public is dismayed by the flagrant lack of respect for the liberties of individual citizens would be an understatement. Furthermore, the inhuman treatment that those arrested are ostensibly being subjected to while in police custody is a clear testament to the blatant mockery of democratic values. Yet none can claim that this is indeed not typical of our police “force” that is presently ranting about reforms in its rank and file! Bastardized affront to decency, civility and internationally accepted norms is what our police force is better known for.

The coalition Government must know that the criminal acts of the police force are continually giving them (Government) a bad name. Their continued silence to this infringement can only imply that they are abetting or they are accomplices in these acts of impunity. Is the Government out to evenly cover the FPE muck?

It must be made abundantly clear to the Coalition Government that democracy and development can not blossom in such an environment.
I wish to appeal to legislators and the general public, that as lovers of social justice, peace, democracy and development, we must condemn in the strongest terms possible this uncivilized act of the police. We must demand for speedy, free and fair trial of those who have shown the courage to sacrifice for the sake of the millions of poor Kenyan children.
We must say no to frivolous litigations. If the police are found to have infringed on the liberties of those in their custody then the full force of the law must be meted against them.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

MAU COMPLEX: LEADERS MUST STOP FOSTERING SECTIONAL POLITICS BY PLAYING ON THE EMOTIONS OF THEIR POLITICAL SUPPORTERS.

Dear Sir/Madam,

According to Thomas Jefferson (1745-1826) “ignorance is preferable to error and that he is less remote from the truth he who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.” The validity of the above assertion finds a haven in the on- going politics of compensation of the illegal settlers evicted from the Mau complex. Sadly, a section of leaders from the political divide are increasingly ranting based on reasoned errors. They have not only taken leave of the rule of law but they also want to force down the throats of Kenyan taxpayers a version of their truth based on their reasoned untruths.

I say so because deliberations of the cabinet must be brought before parliament which can either adopt, amend, or reject them in Toto. The cabinet adopted the Mau Task Force Report which was then tabled in parliament which then made specific amendments before adopting the report. Specifically and without any shred of tenderness to the poor and title-less settlers legislators mainly from Rift valley compelled the Government to only compensate the executive squatters of the Mau complex.

Upon adoption of the amended report by the Mau Task Force, it is expected that the line ministries must implement such parliamentary directives to the letter. However, if a cabinet minister in the process of executing this directive thinks it prudent to alter certain provisions in the directive, then he or she must seek approval of the cabinet and parliament respectively lest he or she is accused of undermining the constitutional authority of parliament but more seriously departing radically from the principle of collective cabinet responsibility. In civilized democracies, such a minister must be compelled by the cabinet and parliament to resign in the interest of the nation. It is even worse when such a departure is informed by sectional politics.

“In The Africa Experience” by Professor Vincent B Khapoya, we can only “become a functional democracy if and only if we do not allow our political leaders to use tribes or more accurately, regional linguistic groups as vehicles of symbolic expression of political competition.” He succinctly states that ‘tribalism, which is an unsatisfactory a concept in political science as in social anthropology is an idiom within which sectional competition takes place. It is this sectional competition that leads to violence. The panacea therefore lies in the electorate not allowing such sectional leaders from fostering sectional identification by playing on the emotions of their political followers to win political support.
Yet in spite of the 2007-2008 PEV in Kenya, sectional politics seems to be taking a better toll of our conscience. A look at the on going politics of compensation of the Mau evictees is a testament to this sad reality.

You see, millions of Kenyans are landless, yet in spite of their landlessness, they have forever remained law abiding citizens. They have never invaded gazetted forests. The fact that they have not been as lucky to have the mainstream media bring to light their plight does not in any way make them less deserving for land. Rather than risk being seen as selectively and emotionally philanthropic, it would have been prudent were the legislators behind the call for compensation of the title-less Mau evictees to urgently pass legislation that would see to it that the Government (read the taxpayers) provides land for all the landless but law abiding citizens in the country. They characteristic of themselves, failed to rise to the occasion. Yes, selfishness is their second nature. The amendment on the floor of the House is a testament to this. Not even their crocodile tears can now save their faces before the Mau evictees or their political supporters across the country. Their lies have finally been nailed to the counter.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

IS THE VP A CONNIVING OPPORTUNIST OR A PHILANDERING OPPORTUNIST?

Dear Sir/Madam,

Remember the days when the Vice President, aka, the miracle worker said that he speaks prophetically? Didn`t he say that he will pass in their midst and none will see him? Of course we all know that that was a prophecy that never was. Now the VP, somewhat re-energized has once more dusted and adorned his prophetic regalia and is traversing the whole country in the company of some YK92 brigand and possible ICC customers proselytizing the re- birth of a political Kenya in 2012 no doubt under his stewardship.

I must admit that that his latest prophecy has left my mind wide open as is my mouth. So I will beg of you to lend me five minutes of your precious time as we try to explicate this “prophecy.” To begin with, I must remind you of the words of George Elliot (1819-1890) who said that “among all forms of mistakes, prophecy is the most gratuitous.” You see, with prophecy it is never important whether the prophet or his ardent followers have none of the gentleman`s instincts when strutting about its fulfillment. Not even once must you mistake a prophet for a nattering Nabob. Not even when the prophet appears to be like an Ali Baba with the forty thieves. Are we not warned of dire consequences if we should have as much as a shred of doubt against the mouthpiece of the greater god?

This conviction explains why the VP is not about to let this “prophecy thing” go. He is talking straight without butting his eyelid because he wants all and sundry in the “wilderness” to believe that yesterday`s land grabbers and plunderers of the economy can in a jiffy become transformative leaders. But wait a minute, didn`t Zachaeus the thieving taxman return what he had amassed all his thieving years to avoiding being hanged by public opinion? To imagine that not even a single word of confession has come out of any one in the VP`s new found fold makes it irrational. You and I know that irrationally held truths may be more harmful than reasoned errors. The VP knows as much as the conscientious public does that people with skeletons in their closets cannot be transformative leaders. If the VP is not peddling irrational truths then what is behind his façade?

It is not surprising that the VP sees formidable allies in the YK92. It is also not surprising that the VP prefers parading his irrationally held truths in the front page of the main stream media. The real reason why the VP is brazenly wagging hopeful where many seasoned politicians would have been crestfallen is because the VP is a conniving opportunist. Like a ravenous vulture he is patiently waiting for others to do the killing. But he fervently hopes that they would not be around for long to feast on their kill. For courtesy of ICC some will have fallen from grace to grass leaving their political turfs orphaned. It is this scenario that has him salivating at the prospects of bagging sympathy votes that may just propel him to State House.

If the ICC does not live up to its promise then that will surely mark the beginning of an end to this much hyped prophecy. The VP will go it alone in 2012 for he cannot and will never play a second fiddling to anybody. So if I were those who mistakenly think that the VP is a philanthropist, I would think twice. Why for instance, is one of the VP`s trusted foot soldier busy courting Ocampo to fast track the indictment process as the VP thinks it prudent to spread his political harem far and wide? So is the VP a conniving opportunist or a philandering philanthropist?

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

THE CLOSURE OF PAN PAPER MILLS (WEBUYE) IS A BLESSING IN DISGUISE.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Even as we haggle over the reopening of the Pan Paper Mills in Webuye, the voice of those who think that its closure is a blessing in disguise must not be hushed. It is true that the Plant provided a livelihood to the over 80,000 residents of the town and beyond. But it is also true that this Plant was a terrible health hazard to the many innocent residents. Emissions from this plant have been known to damage people`s lungs; lowering their resistance to diseases like pneumonia and influenza. Seepage from the sulfide ponds to the Nzoia River which is the source of domestic water to the residents is a fact that cannot be wished away. Furthermore, cases of increased skin ailments have also been noted.
Yes, that Pan Paper Mill has been dishing out doses of slow death is not in doubt. Records from the health facilities within the town and its environs confirm that respiratory diseases especially among the infants and the elderly have been on a steady increase and so is the resultant mortality rate.

Moreover, rusting of corrugated iron sheets is a common phenomenon. The residents are forced to replace the iron sheets on their houses more often than it is necessary.

Yet even without scientific proof of the level of pollution and its attendant poisonous gases, any Tom, Dick and Harry would attest to the fact that it was extremely difficult to gulp a mouthful of fresh air in Webuye town and its environs. Foul smell filled the air and could be smelled as far as 80Km away depending on the direction of the wind. But that was not the only thing, "snowstorms" of foam droplets from the plant`s waste ponds clouded the sky.

Yet, being the only source of livelihood of this town, people were forced to choose between two devils: Pangs of hunger or a plate of food courtesy of the poison spewing Mill. Out of necessity, they chose the latter. Unbeknown to them, they had chosen to be slaves in a poisonous gaseous chamber.

An analysis of the town`s air samples and the factories pulp were taken for laboratory analysis in California. The results of the analysis were a downright shocker. The hydrogen sulfide level was more than 140 times over and above the permissible standard by the World Health Organization (WHO). Startled by these findings, and aware of the financial loses that the shareholders were to incur as a result of the inevitable closure of the plant, and cognizant of the litany of litigations for compensation that were to follow, the Government disowned the findings and branded the whole exercise a conspiracy by the environmental activists, nay fraudsters.

Thanks to the rampant corruption and mismanagement the plant finally ground to a halt. With its closure followed intriguing political promises about its reopening. But what the Government does not want to admit is that the closure of the plant put it in a catch 22 situation. Even if it was to keep the opportunists at bay, still there are more moral questions that the Government has to contend with.

First, is the question of whether the Government should reopen the plant in total disregard of the scientific evidence with regard to the dangers that this plant exposes people.

Second, even if we presuppose that the management will be streamlined; would it not be prudent for the Government to minimize the hazardous emissions first before the plant reopens? And, will the minimization of pollution levels be cost effective?
Three, knowing very well that the plant`s consumption of trees far outpaces the rate at which trees are replanted, shall we not be going against our resolve of conserving our vital water towers?

In view of the foregoing, it is my considered view that the social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment and the cost benefit analysis associated with the reopening of the plant are all in the negative.

Aware of these issues, the Government must not keep the hopes of the resident alive. It must take a bold step and inform them that it is in their own interest and that of the country that the plant is not reopened.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

WHAT BECOMES OF THE YOUTHS WHEN ELDERS MISCONTRUE METAPHORICAL SPEECH?

Dear Sir/madam,

The Gikuyu of Kenya believe that they have to speak in proverbs and that he who is intelligent must understand. The Igbo of Nigeria say that “proverbs are the kola nuts with which words are eaten” while the Yoruba say that “a proverb is the horse of words; if a word is lost, a proverb is used to find it.” The above examples only serve to underscore the importance with which the elders in our respective African societies attached to the use of not only proverbs but metaphorical speech in general.

Proverbs, similes and metaphors played a normative, reflective, summative and aesthetic role especially in day today social relations. In fact for one to be elevated to the coveted position of an elder in any given community one`s mettle was measured as to how one was well conversant with the usage of such metaphorical speech. Metaphorical language was the embodiment of the wisdom of the society. The elders in each community were thus expected to impart this knowledge to all and sundry and especially to the youth through this medium.

As afore said, it was expected that any intelligent person would not fail to grasp the objects of reference in a metaphorical speech and how such objects compared with what was meant with respect to a given context. If for instance, it was said in a given context that “the forest has not changed it is only the monkeys that are different”, it would be naïve for one to come out guns blazing to claim that the speaker has debased his audience by calling them monkeys!

I therefore find it unelderly and totally dishonest for “nominated elders” to misconstrue the Prime Minister`s “omena” and ‘mbuta” phrases in reference to the “poor and hapless illegal settlers” and the “executive squatters” of the Mau complex respectively. What a pity. What, pray thee can the youth learn from them? Indeed things are changing pretty fast and the more they change, they do not remain the same, instead they change for the worst. It looks as if now more than ever before someone has to remind these latter day elders that they have ceased being the custodians of our rich African Heritage and instead they have become political hirelings for destruction.

Honestly, I do not think that the Mau conservation is within their purview as nominated elders. This is only but a testament to the fact that the so called elders are more than willing to be engaged in all sorts of political brinkmanship.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

FPE: ABSENCE OF EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (EMIS) CONDUIT TO THE CANCEROUS PILFERAGE.

Dear Sir/madam,

Donors provide funding on condition that the assistance they give is in line with their overall policies. It is also true that they have to spend their funds according to the agreements made, and the need to be sure that a programme achieves its intended objectives. This is because all donors are accountable to the public opinion in their respective countries. That is why donors would try as much as possible to influence programmes` methodology in accordance to their values and principles.

It is thus paramount that the implementation of a donor funded programme is based on an acknowledgement and balancing of possible conflicting motives and interests. If this is not done, then the programme risks becoming a contest between the Government and the donor at the expense of the interests of the “target group”, yet in practice and intent the interests of the target group ought to have the highest priority.

It is therefore the public`s expectation that as development partners, DFID and the Kenya Government have to put in place shared Efficient Management Information System (EMIS) vital for the implementation of the FPE programme for a timely and smooth flow of information to policy makers, planners, donors, managers and other stakeholders at all levels of this fund.
In the absence of EMIS, as is apparently the case in the MoBE, timely monitoring, evaluation and even auditing of the said funds is rarely a priority. It is only through EMIS, that the public would be spared the never ending circus characterized by self denials, threats, accusations and counter accusations from the MoBE over alleged embezzlement and misappropriation of this very sensitive fund.

Professor Ongeri must be advised that it is useless to doubt the authenticity and validity of the DFID`s report when it is very clear that in the absence of EMIS, the Ministry is professionally handicapped to effectively discharge its duties with respect to the FPE fund. The failure of the Minister and his Permanent Secretary to put in place EMIS has created a perfect conduit for the never ending pilferage in the Ministry.

It puzzles many that the Minister for Basic Education appears to be vindicating the technocrats in whose jurisdiction the alleged misappropriation or embezzlement of FPE funds took place while largely letting the investigation center on those whose departments are far removed from the alleged corruption. This can only be a pointer to the fact that what is under investigation is not the alleged corruption. I have a hunch that the investigation may be targeting those within the ministry who may have deliberately fed DFID with the “wrong information.”

The Minister and his Permanent Secretary must be advised to stop engaging in chicanery and neither should they project themselves as arrogant ignominies. Instead of the Minister declaring emphatically that there is no question of him resigning in response to the current snowballing corruption that has dogged the Ministry, he should consider stepping down in the interest of the millions of the children whose future is unashamedly being stolen by the callous technocrats.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

GOVERNMENT MUST UNCOVER AND SEQUESTER MORE ARMS CACHE.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Ever since the arrest and arraignment of a number of Kenyan security personnel and a couple in connection with the discovery of huge amounts of arms and ammunition, a good deal of controversy has centered on this potentially explosive incident. A number of analysts hold forth that there is existence of vast and dangerous organization(s) with vast resources connected with the trading in arms within and without the country. It is understood that some of the said callous profiteers are in Government. It appears that top security operatives are complacent and would thus deliberately create security lapses with a view to ensuring a safe transit of such huge cache of arms.

Others believe that the Government could be supplying arms and ammunition to countries such as Somalia to aid them in vanquishing the dreaded Al Qaida backed AL Shabab. The fact that Kenya is a neutral state and a signatory to the United Nations convention on the proliferation of arms makes it difficult for Kenya to supply such arms to a country like Somalia and still preserve its neutral status. As a neutral state, the country`s agencies and officers must not directly or indirectly participate in commercial or financial aid of war in any country. That is why the likes of the Narok business man become a perfect smokescreen for the Government in the event that the deal goes awry. It is easy for the Government to think that it can engage in such action without sucking itself into the Somali furnace. However, the truth is that with our porous boarders, we may not have the capacity to contain the AL Shabab`s blitzkrieg. The Somali crisis needs a global approach and not a disjointed effort such as ours.
The above two situations could explain why despite the fact that the trend has continued unabated as is alleged, the police and the country`s intelligentsia are ostensibly unable to uncover or sequester such large amounts of arms and ammunition.

It is perhaps the third and final school of thought that is more worrisome especially for a country like Kenya that is just smarting from the numbing effects of the infamous 2007 Post Election Violence (PEV). Proponents of this school of thought opine that there is a twofold reason for stockpiling by a section of the Kenyan populace. First is to arm themselves and thwart any attempts by the ICC against indicting the financiers of the 2007 PEV who are perceived to be the defenders of the interests of the said community or communities in question. Secondly, it is in readiness to the 2012 elections. According to these analysts, some politicians are willing to go this far on a road to a civil war in order to achieve their selfish political ambitions and are hell-bent on financing the stockpiling exercise. Simply put, bullets would achieve what the ballot cannot. The seizure is therefore a belt away credence of the intensive rearmament exercise in readiness for either the 2012 elections and or the possible indictment of their “own” by the ICC. It is not lost to all that barely a month ago, senior security agents and a section of politicians rebuffed Ken Wafula, a North Rift Human Rights activist, for peddling irrationalities about an arms build up by communities in sections of the country.

If indeed this school of thought bears some semblance of truth, and if it is in any way connected with the seizure of the arms cache, then it has undoubtedly exposed the sham of the Government`s blatant talk about disarmament, peace and reconciliation in a country that is just smarting from a tumultuous electioneering period then the latest seizure is a more adverse sign of what the future portends for this country. Talking of peace without touching on its obstacle is balderdash.

There is a growing feeling among the public that if the Government initiates a dragnet search, more hide outs and arms cache would be found. The Government must rise to the occasion and carry out a real and effective disarmament and prevent further stockpiling.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

RAILA AND RUTO ON AN EPIC WAR OF REPUTATION.

Dear Sir/Madam,
I dare say that there is no love lost between William Ruto and Raila Odinga. They were and are still allies out of convenience. And, there is no denying that both have so much in common. Retired president Moi still writhes in anger at their combinatorial analysis that rendered his 2002 presidential choice kaput. Some analysts opine that both Ruto and Raila bear the terseness and calculated simplicity that they use to dumbfound friend and foe alike. Others view them as a bullies of the Left Bank who are always ready to twist the milksop`s arm. Both have rarely stayed in a party to fight a war to its logical conclusion. As many have extolled them as they have besmirched them. For those who extol them, they view them as bullfighters par excellence whose forays many would dare not venture. Knowing them, many would be least startled that they have now locked horns or so it appears. But before they hastily shout “aluta continua”, it would be prudent that both Raila and Ruto take the counsel of Ernest Hemingway. He said that “Bullfighting is the only art in which the artist is in danger of death and which the degree of brilliance in the performance is left in the fighter`s honor.”
That both Ruto and Raila are literally bullfighters is not in doubt. That both have intricate moves and prowess that they employ in vanquishing their foes is still not in doubt. If indeed they are on a warpath to attain the top honors then theirs is a mouth-watering war of reputation. I am calling it a war because it is a series of battles. Thomas Green etal opine that, “Reputation is the cornerstone of power. Through reputation alone you can intimidate and win; once you slip, however, you are vulnerable, and will be attacked on all sides. Make your reputation unassailable. Always be alert to potential attacks and thwart them before they happen. Meanwhile, learn to destroy your enemies by opening holes in their own reputations. Then stand aside and let public opinion hang them.”
So what are the battle fronts that make up this war of reputation? You will agree with me that these would be based on their individual stance on issues of national and international import, their respective coterie and lastly their abilities to transcend ethnic and age barriers.
Ruto has frantically albeit unsuccessfully, tried wrecking havoc on Raila`s reputation on Post Election Violence and Mau respectively but public and international opinion has in both instances favored the latter. Raila on his part has successfully portrayed himself as a selfless leader who will risk losing his political clout if only to place himself at the service of the nation and indeed the world! His articulation of issues of import has earned him political enemies as well as both local and international accolades. Many have likened him to the proverbial lizard that sought to jump from the highest Iroko tree to fall flat on its belly and survive to tell the tale.
As to one`s coterie, it has been said that if one walks like a duck and quacks like a duck then one must be a duck. Whereas it is difficult to pinpoint exactly Raila`s coterie, the same cannot be said of Ruto who has signaled to all and sundry that he doesn`t mind working with the YK92 retread! I hold it that Ruto cannot hope to amass political capital with dubious characters that even the most naïve among us would have no iota of doubt, that given chance, they can only spend our country into oblivion. I put it that in such company Ruto stands to gather personal embarrassment than popularity.
On transcending the ethnic and age barrier, Ruto satiates himself in the company of ethno-centric youthful legislators who have nothing in common with Kenyans who are just smarting from the disastrous effects of PEV. These are the political barkers with no political idealism of whatever persuasion. Raila on the other hand is tirelessly working to endear himself to this disappointed and disillusioned youthful voting block.
From the foregoing, it is crystal clear that Ruto needs to change tact. And he must do it quickly. As Richard Bentley said in reference to Alexander Popes, “I hold it as certain that no man was ever written out of reputation but by himself.”

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

MOURNING THE DEARTH OF SOUND LEGISLATION COURTESY OF POLITICAL BARKERS.

Dear Sir/madam,

Many of those who were incarcerated by the Kenyatta and Moi regimes respectively confided that they drew their inspiration from Thoreau. When Thoreau was placed in prison for ostensibly refusing to pay taxes, he was visited by Ralph Waldo Emerson who asked, “Thoreau, what are you doing in jail?” To which Thoreau replied, “Ralph, what are you doing outside, when honest people are in jail for their ideals?” This is the budding spirit of liberation that characterized yesterday`s youthful patriots who sacrificed everything including their valuable lives and those of their families to make a better Kenya for everyone. They believed that they were the atoms in the incessant human struggle towards the light that shines in the darkness—the Ideal of economic, political and spiritual liberation of Kenyans from all walks of life. They believed that not even in their demise, would the seeds of liberation they had painstakingly planted and watered, wither. The torture chambers could not just contain their budding youthful spirits.

Unfortunately, today, a huge chunk of youths have in so startling a manner departed from the philosophy of those who gallantly fought to have us enjoy some of the freedoms we enjoy today. Going by what transpires in the tenth parliament, youthfulness is no longer in the fore front of the liberation struggle. The liberation struggle has been given a wide berth. Neither do they care to e on the right side of history. Instead, politics of deceit and ethnicity is the order of the day. They will rarely hesitate to adapt the facts to fit the selfish cause for which they care. Yes, youthfulness has become an age of credulity. Many a youthful legislators are totally inept. They are phoney.

Is not evident that the Kenyan parliament is increasingly becoming a precinct of cerelac and youthful legislators some of whom are evidently suffering from petrified adolescence? They elect to permanently engage in gross-out sessions wherever they go. Rather than engage in sound legislation in parliament, they falsely think that the ability to badmouth government and personalities is a mark of true leadership and valor. In fact, they will oppose sound legislative pieces if only to settle political scores. Be ware, this is the crop of new political leaders that are taking over this country with a storm. So disgusting are they that at times I am on the verge of dispensing with the paragon of civility and shouting at them “Hark ye, friends, have you got padlocks on your (***) that you should sh-te through your teeth?”

What is more worrying is the fact that some of the political kingpins desperately need these scrubs to advance their selfish political interests. However, the danger is that the same political kingpins risk their minds being contaminated. That they stand shilly shally on issues of national importance lends credence to fact that they constantly imbibe vile while in the company of these BARKERS.

I for one cannot believe that love of one's country lies in blindness to its social faults, in deafness to its social discords or in not articulating its social wrongs. Neither can I believe that the mere accident of one being elected to parliament gives one a carte blanche to purvey falsehoods, inanities and vitriol most foul.

I know many people (I am one of them) who love Kenya with deeper passion and greater intensity than many of the current youthful legislators whose patriotism manifests itself in pulling, kicking, and insulting the fabric of our society.
I rightly think that now more than ever before the conscientious public is duty bound to bawl out these political BARKERS. This is because if this trend is left unchecked, then there is real danger that this country will inevitably suffer from the dearth of sound legislation. This is the worst form of impotency that any country can suffer from. It is for this reason that I wholly support the architects of the draft constitution for including a clause that empowers the electorate to recall any political saunterer.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

THE BATTLE OF OPINIONS AND THE PROSELYTIZATION OF POLITICAL TOURISM AND PERFIDY.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Politicians have once more proved that they have nothing to offer anybody except their own confusion. In the words of Antonin Artaud, “If confusion is the sign of times, I see at the root of this confusion, a rupture between things and words, and between things and signs that are their representation.”

What can one say when a government function to promote tourism in the North Rift ends up being a forum to proselytize political tourism and political perfidy? Three cabinet ministers led a brigade of Rift Valley legislators on a journey to promote a political circuit in the area.
The government in which they all serve was turned into a common enemy, nay, a curse, and speaker after speaker “justifiably” directed his arsenal against this “terrible curse.” In a desperate attempt to craft a regional alliance, they all dispensed with the paragon of civility. Lyrical waxing legislators went straight for the government`s jugular. They said it loud and clear that they themselves were the only “transformative leaders” that this country badly needs. However, their verbal snafus and preposterous sound bytes was the only visible sign of their ‘competence and efficiency.”

This is ad nauseum. Why? Because we would be naïve as a country were we to allow individuals with skeletons in their closets to use alliances to sanitize their dark past. We have not forgotten how the YK92 architects literally bled this country and left it for dead. A good number of those shouting from the roof tops of the need for transformational leadership are themselves devoid of any iota of political idealism of whatever persuasion. All they want is to get to the helm of leadership so that they can evenly cover their muck.

We cannot allow this country to sink to unbelievably low levels as a democracy courtesy of political leaders who incessantly reduce issues of national importance like the conservation of Mau, the constitution and retribution to macho sparring. Their failure to appreciate the fact that this nation can prosper faster through a genuine and deliberate effort rather than seeking to lead on the platform of tribal alliances bespeaks volumes of the content in them. It is abundantly clear that should leaders refuse to learn from the past and ignore lessons from the country`s mistakes then they shall simply be leading this country in to a more tumultuous future covered with the deceptive warmth of their ignorance.

I must confess that like many others who attended the Kapenguria rally, I found it preposterous that cabinet ministers should suddenly depart from the principle of collective cabinet responsibility in so startling a way. If indeed these ministers are dog tired of serving in this Government as they want the electorate to believe, then they must resign. Yes, let them resign or be sacked so that they can have a carte blanche to criticize the government from the comforts of the backbench. After all, there is no indispensable man. The Government will not collapse and go to pieces if anyone of the gentlemen who are seeking to be entrusted with its guidance should resign.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

RETIRED PRESIDENT MOI MUST NOT TALK SENSELESS AND WRITE HIMSELF OUT OF REPUTATION.

Dear Sir/Madam,
I must admit that I have never seen the wisdom in the leading media houses affording retired president Moi acres of space to comment on socio-economic and political issues affecting this country. The media must realize that Moi will never ever tire of media attention. He will gloat. Believe me you, he will blubber. The media knows this weakness. It also knows too well that it is a mistake to keep on haunting him out of his peaceful retirement. What is not clear though is why they (Media) have kept on accosting him in his retirement. Why increasingly let the man blubber himself out of any iota of reputation?
It is not had to tell. The media is affording him acres of coverage perhaps with a view to making him believe that at 85, his mind is far much better than anyone`s else. To the mainstream media, it is sweet music to hear Moi say that in his reasoned opinion, the excision of the Mau complex for tea farming is the only novel idea for conservation of our water towers! According to the senior Moi, the on going Mau conservation effort is bound to fail ostensibly because the Government is holding the wrong side of the stick.
You see after many years of his word being above reproach, he still thinks the government of the day is made up of idiots. This is because it is expressing reasoned opinions which are different from his. After all, he is an expert. Yes, an expert who has made all the mistakes that could possibly be made in his 24 year reign. This is the repertoire of wisdom that characterized Moi`s 24 year executive fiat. This the wisdom that he employed in the creation of today`s Mau executive squatters: To establish lush tea estates in this water tower. Today, he must be wondering why the Government of the day is unwilling to “fuata nyayo.” Why is the government unwilling to drink from his pond of wisdom?
To keep the story short, the senior Moi is simply asking the Government to allow him continue his tea business in Mau. As far as he is concerned, it is the Government`s headache to deal with the illegal Mau evictees as long as his lush tea farm is untouched. Herein lies the trap; if Moi stays put, so will his coterie. The conservation exercise will definitely have flopped.
Obnoxious as this may sound, yet it is a testament to the fact that his opposition (as well as that of many others) to the Mau evictions was not about the welfare of the hapless and helpless illegal settlers but for his own selfish interests. The bitter truth is that the illegal Mau evictees are but mere pawns for the peers of the realm. Moi and his coterie literally “imported” gullible Kenyans from Kericho, Bomet and Baringo and put them in the Mau to act as a shield against any future threats of evictions from successive regimes. That is why today, they troop back to their ethnic enclave and make the loudest noise from the roof tops to scare away the Government of the day from undoing their ecological plunder. This is a clever ploy about tea farms conserving the water tower is only aimed at spreading confusion so as to ensure that the Government of the day is kept off balance. They do not want to let the ruts get deeper than they already are.
My exhortation to the government is that it must never allow itself to be derailed from this noble conservation exercise. Instead it must do everything in its power to get rid of this wicked form of opportunism and propaganda in our midst.
As for retired president Moi, let him take counsel in the words of Oliver Cromwell, “I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken” on this noble conservation exercise.
TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.
http://twitter.com/tomefrancis

COLLECTIVE CABINET RESPONSIBILITY KEY TO IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA FOUR.

Dear Sir/Madam,

One of the most fundamental questions that the cabinet and by extension, the entire country is grappling with is whether Parliamentary Watchdog Committees are overstepping their mandate through their constant erection of roadblocks on the path to implementation of government policy. The Prime Minister thinks that an overbearing parliamentary watchdog is an impediment to the proper functioning of the cabinet, so do a host of other cabinet Ministers. However, the speaker and members of parliament think otherwise. They opine that it is rather the disjointed cabinet and the political intrigues surrounding it coupled with its expediency and ineptitude that has naturally inspired the parliamentary Watchdogs to fill the resultant void. I entirely agree with the speaker of the National Assembly. Suffice to say that Cabinet Ministers have totally forgotten the import of collective responsibility as a cabinet. In fact, cabinet has become the biggest stumbling block to the government`s reform agenda. The term collective cabinet responsibility is akin to hybrid seeds planted in unhealthy soils to the majority of cabinet ministers.
Collective ministerial responsibility entails three principles: the confidence rule, cabinet solidarity, and cabinet confidentiality. These principles help ensure that the cabinet pursues a policy consistent with the priorities of the country. In our Coalition Government, the president and the PM form the Cabinet by appointing members of Parliament as ministers to direct government ministries. The president, the PM and cabinet ministers thus propose laws that become the basis for public policy.
The confidence rule is obvious. Without the cabinet having confidence in each other, then the import of having a cabinet ceases. Let me therefore dwell in detail on the remaining two principles. Perhaps the most fundamental pillar of collective ministerial responsibility is cabinet solidarity. Here the cabinet ensures a unified stance in everything it pursues. Granted, cabinet ministers can disagree but only in the privacy of the Cabinet. However, once a decision is made, they must loyally support and defend the government’s position or resign.
Moreover, individual cabinet ministers must not announce new policy or changes in policy without the Cabinet’s approval. They must carry out cabinet-approved policies with respect to their own ministries, whether or not they agree with such policies. Finally, they are expected to vote with the government always. The President and the Prime Minister must always therefore enforce cabinet solidarity. In the event that dissenting voices emerge from the cabinet, then the President in consultation with the PM can ask ministers to resign. In case they refuse to resign then the president can sack them.

The the other important aspect of the cabinet that is part and parcel of collective cabinet responsibility is confidentiality. Ministers swear an oath to protect cabinet secrecy. Documents used to support cabinet decision-making are highly confidential, and any public servant who discloses cabinet secrets can be imprisoned.

However, of late, things have gone haywire. Non adherence to the policy of collective responsibility has seriously undermined the working of the cabinet. Very little or none of cabinet solidarity, confidence and confidentiality have been seen. Cabinet secrets and documents have increasingly found their way to the public domain. Obviously, some disgruntled elements within the cabinet are behind this leakage. The division in the cabinet has reached parliament with every minister with political clout manipulating legislation for his or her own ulterior motives. Take the stand off between the PM and his erstwhile ally William Ruto, the Minister for Agriculture; there differences have spiraled into parliament with a section of the latter`s supporters threatening to move a censure motion to settle political scores with the former over the Mau eviction saga.

This country decries a weak cabinet. This is because a fragile cabinet can never deliver the crucial agenda four reforms that the country urgently requires. It is time that the cabinet owned up to its mistakes and agrees to give this country a new beginning. For in the words of Cardinal de Retz (1617-1679), “The man who can own up to his error is greater than he who merely knows how to avoid making it.”

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

SHADES OF POLITICAL SIN AND THE DEARTH OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP.

Dear Sir/Madam,

We saw them jostle for space on the “high table.” And from this high table, vitriol flew high left, right and centre as if the speakers were competing to see whose vitriol would tickle the most. Vitriol kept flying high even from unlikely quarters like the Deputy PM Uhuru Kenyatta. And to think that he could even quote the Holy Bible to wash the vitriol down our throats! Evidently, the poignant atmosphere in the circus of a fundraiser was punctuated by cheap bursts of prolonged laughter from all those gathered. The unmistaken message of such laughter was to make those in attendance realize one`s presence.

Honorable Najib Balala, the cocky Mvita MP and the self styled Minister for political tourism capped it all by stating that those on the high table were the future of this country. In other words, those not on the high table, even though they were present in the fundraiser, they were not part of the future! Among those present in the fundraiser but not on the high table were the likes of Honorable Eugene Wamalwa, the Saboti MP who many across the political divide thought that he epitomized transformational leadership. However, going by Balala`s sentiments, then the youthful Wamalwa is apparently, not part of the future political leadership of this country. I thought that he got the drift, but no, like the rest in the crowd, his laughter and clapping told a different story. So what became of his budding presidential ambitions? Has his new found company dissuaded him from pursuing his ambition?

I know that I have no right telling him who to walk with, for deep down in my heart, I know that like the iconic Nelson Mandela`s rejoinder to Bill Clinton, he will quip: “let me choose my friends as you choose your enemies.” But I will not tire for I will find solace in the aphorism of the erstwhile Kimilili MP, “if one walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then he must be a duck!” Through Wamalwa`s body language we now know his bosom friends. Has he not been spotted from time to time snuggling in the company of the same youthful political tourists, opportunists and slanderers who are busy casting their ethno-political net wide and far? Their political intrigues and the display of expediency coupled with sheer ineptitude among these political tourists, nay “transformational leaders” threatens to vanquish the very future that they are preaching to the youth. Could be that they take advantage of the youth being the age of credulity?

Someone needs to tell Honorable Wamalwa pretty fast that if he does not re-examine his conscience, his well guarded personality and his razor sharp brain risks decomposing in the company of trivial personalities. It is not surprising that of late, his rhetoric is increasingly portraying him as having completely nothing in common with the youth nor does he currently have a wee bit of understanding of the youthful generation that he purports to be the voice of. He leaves us with so many questions unanswered.

How can he be part of those telling the youth that the Government of the day must reward cheats who invaded the Mau Complex and in the same breath promise them a brighter future under his watchful custody! Why is he part of a clique that has become a stumbling block in the Mau Complex conservation efforts? How can he be part of those whose Solomonic wisdom is to rise to the helm of this country`s political leadership through tribal alliances? How can he be in communion with a clique harping on transformational leadership even though their actions and inactions portray them as bullies and opportunists who are pennywise but pound foolish? Just who will be the gad fly to sting honorable Wamalwa back to reality?

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

MAU FOREST OFFERS IDEAL COVER FOR SETTLING POLITICAL SCORES.

THE STANDARD NEWSPAPER, Saturday, 28th November 2009
By Otuma Ongalo

If it was ever in doubt the real motive of ministers and MPs who gathered this week to ostensibly raise funds for Mau forest complex evictees, the doubt was no more at the end of their meeting.
Mau evictees were mere smokescreens and their woes provided invaluable ammunitions in a battle for political supremacy ahead of the 2012 elections. Assistant Minister Kareke Mbiuki let the cat out of the bag when he said those in the gathering were destined for bigger things and would be in Government in 2013 while minister Najib Balala declared it was the team to watch.
Prime Minister Raila Odinga will be the man to beat for the top seat come 2012 elections and Mau saga is merely a proxy war between him and other equally ambitious leaders such as Kalonzo Musyoka, Uhuru Kenyatta, and William Ruto.
The three, who are believed to be nurturing KKK (Kikuyu, Kalenjin and Kamba) alliance, have little, if any, sympathies over the tribulations of the Mau evictees. They are Cabinet members and they are not on record having voiced concerns when the Mau conservation issue was discussed in their meeting. Anything that is likely to be credited to Raila is bound to raise discomfort among the triumvirate.
The Mau preservation is one such issue. Although it was endorsed by MPs, the Cabinet and even President Kibaki, Raila is the face of the initiative. There being no saints in Kenya’s politics, he too could be using the Mau as a political trump card. The difference, however, is that he is pursuing an initiative that portrays him as a nationalist and visionary while his critics emerge as shortsighted populists.
It is not lost to a discerning mind that Ruto, Kalonzo, and Uhuru are among Raila’s greatest political opponents and Balala has joined the bandwagon. For Ruto, the battle for Rift Valley supremacy remains unsettled despite enjoying a sizeable loyal following. If there is anyone between him and Rift Valley kingship, it is Raila and the sooner his political fortunes crumble the merrier for Ruto.
Whether real or farfetched, Ruto has always claimed credit for Raila’s impressive performance in the region during the 2007 presidential elections. This is a fact Raila has refused to acknowledge. The PM’s apparent soft spot for Musalia Mudavadi — who critics think has not made major contributions in ODM’s fortunes — further rubs Ruto the wrong way.
Although it might be rightly so, Ruto must be a bitter man that his fervent support for Raila during the presidential elections has come to haunt him alone as the latter enjoys trappings of power. Raila has never strongly supported Ruto against claims that he played a role in post election violence. He has been fighting a lone battle, including the ongoing bid to have his name expunged from a KNCHR report mentioning him adversely.
Uhuru, on paper, is Raila’s deputy but there has never been political chemistry between the two since Raila shattered his brightest chance ever for presidency when he declared "Kibaki Tosha". That Uhuru was one of the ministers in an explicitly anti-Raila forum was not a coincidence. The recently found warm relationship between Kibaki and Raila could be sending shivers down Uhuru’s spine in his quest to inherit the president’s political mantle in
Central Province.
Perhaps the greatest high profile rivalry, if not animosity, lies between Raila and Kalonzo. Although he did not attend the fundraising — after allegedly being prevailed upon by the President — his lieutenants did and conveyed his blessings. It is not that Kalonzo is a threat to Raila. The PM considers the VP a betrayer — first when he bolted from ODM and for joining Kibaki to form government at a time he was involved with Raila in a bitter election dispute.

Otunga Ongalo is a collumnist with the Standard Newspaper.

MAU CRISIS MAY HAVE CEMENTED RAILA`S PLACE AHEAD OF THE PACK.

The Standard Newspaper
Saturday, 28th November 2009

Most Kenyans agree that evacuation from the Mau should be done humanely. The solution will, however, not come from politically charged harambee drives which are more about political alignments for 2012 than they are about struggling squatters. Note that the big Harambee raised a mere five million shillings. Could the nine Cabinet ministers not raise this amount and even more from the Government if they were that serious? The Special Programmes ministry alone is spending many times that amount, not to mention well-wishers such as the Red Cross.
And why did the objecting politicians not take similar stands on other water tower related evictions or the murderous deportation of some communities from the Rift Valley in 1992, 1997 and 2008? Why did those who are now revealing to us that Raila did not win in 2007 not intervene against revenge murders of innocent Kenyans?
By painting him as the bad guy, Raila’s opponents have only made him stronger. Many Kenyans now know that you can count on him to take a decision that could derail his political ambitions for the sake of country. This side of his character is not new. When he was Roads minister he ruffled the rich who had grabbed road reserves by demolishing their big bungalows. By now one hopes that Kenyans can no longer be easily swayed by political fence-sitters and extremists. They will no longer just follow what politicians tell them blindly; not after a chain of poor advice.
Raila’s political history has clearly demonstrated that among his competitors he has been the most consistent and has paid the highest price for his beliefs. I doubt that anyone of them has done more to liberate Kenya from an oppressive state. In addition to years of detention, Raila was a key member of the team that stuck their necks out for change in 1991. His "Kibaki Tosha" declaration at Uhuru Park in 2002 was crucial in sending Kanu packing. Just think of what would have been left of this country if Kanu continued its reign or if some of these Kanu characters bounce back to the top job.
Unlike Raila, his opponents and the fence-sitters have demonstrated a different kind of consistency; the kind that almost led this country to the dogs in an undemocratic Kanu regime they served rather faithfully. Some of them made a kill from the excesses of the time through corrupt business and land deals. If some had their way, they would have preferred continuation of that plundering regime.
There are those who have argued that virtually all our top leaders, Raila included, have at one time or the other been Kanu strongmen. I however believe that Raila joined Kanu out of frustration with an opposition too divided along ethnic lines and a section that sold the propaganda to the effect that a Luo was unfit for the presidency. Changing a system from within is an acceptable political strategy; Raila used insider privilege to destroy Kanu for the national good. In fact, most of those who dumped Kanu in 2001 would not have done so were it not for the power and organisational ability of Raila after Moi overlooked them for the top seat.
The Mau has presented us with an ideal opportunity to separate the wheat from the chaff as we head to 2012. We should ask some simple questions: Who among the presidential aspirants has a demonstrated history of fearlessly standing up for what is right irrespective of the possible negative consequences for self and family? Who has been the more national in outlook?
It is time we ashamed agents of tribal politics aware that tribal alignments can only lead us back to the Banana and Orange fights of 2005 and 2007. Let’s be mindful of political rolling stones who detest permanent homes because they are a real danger to national stability.

Kilemi Mwiria is an Assistant Minister for Higher Education, Science and Technology and MP for Tigania West.
kilemimwiria@gmail.com
www.twitter.com/kilemi

VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE AGAINST PM PREMISED ON WRONG POLITICAL JUDGEMENT.

Dear Sir/Madam,

A fortnight ago, honorable Joshua Kuttuny reminded all and sundry that Rift Valley legislators have numerical strength in the tenth Parliament and could therefore “do something.” It now emerges that “the something” he was referring to was a vote of no confidence against the Prime Minister. This is the standard practice in many democracies around the globe. Parliament uses this arsenal with a view to checking on executive misconduct, or its effect, especially if the official`s unbecoming behavior subverts the structure of government or undermines the integrity of the office or the Constitution itself. So if there is sufficient proof that a government official is behaving in a manner grossly incompatible with the proper function and purpose of the office or that he employs the power of his office for an improper purpose or for personal gain, then a vote of no confidence comes in handy.

In Kenya such a threshold is seemingly non-existent. It may well be that a section of the political divide may invoke this power simply because they do not like one`s nose. This lacuna may seriously undermine the integrity of the office of the PM. For instance, a look at section 4b of the National Accord and Reconciliation Act, 2008, states that “the office of the Prime Minister shall become vacant if the National Assembly passes a resolution which is supported by a majority of all the members of the National Assembly, excluding the ex-officio members, and of which not less than seven days notice has been given, declaring that the National Assembly has no confidence in the Prime Minister.” From the foregoing it is apparent that the grounds for the vote of no confidence are conspicuously missing hence leaving this crude weapon to become a matter of political judgment. I bet this is akin to a demented old sucker monkey holding a loaded gun.

But how honest are the politicians behind this vote of no confidence? You see, the Prime Minister is simply supervising the implementation of that which the cabinet and parliament agreed to. I thought that it would have been the failure on his part to implement the government`s decision that would have engendered a vote of no confidence against him and not the other way round. Moving a vote of no confidence against the PM based on a reality constructed on pure lies will most certainly prove counter-productive. Those bent on exploiting this provision must know that since the Mau eviction exercise has the blessings of the entire Parliament and Cabinet, then the vote of no confidence must be against the Parliament and the Cabinet. In other words, they must move a motion that seeks the entire Government to resign, or seek a parliamentary dissolution and request a general election. Which Member of Parliament is ready to shoot himself in the foot now? Yep, you guessed it right. Not one among them will dare do that.

Our legislators must re-examine their conscience. They must know that the reason why the eviction process is going against the United Nation`s conventions on human rights, is because of sabotage by the line ministries and not as a result of the gross incompetence of the PM. We are aware of the fact that the PM does not have the powers to dismiss the ministers responsible and the president has not shown any indication that he is about to do that. The vote of no confidence must be moved against the saboteurs of Government`s noble plan.

TOME FRANCIS,

BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

NEO-KU KLUX KLAN ARCHITECTS FIND A SAFE HAVEN IN THE MAU EVICTIONS.

Dear Sir/Madam,

In the words of John Adams, “facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, or our inclination or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” I cannot agree more with these words of wisdom. For sometime the country has expressed outrage at the idea of some self seeking politicians crafting ethnic alliances to propel them to the helm of the country`s political leadership. Every other time the said political leaders vehemently denied it. But if one cared to scratch up on their rhetoric one would surely see the blatant insult of betrayal of our common good as a country. If you ever had doubted this then the Mau evictions saga lends credence to these banality.

It behooves the intelligence of many that despite the Government, the civil society and the mainstream media explaining with intermittent patience the catastrophic effect of not conserving the country`s largest water tower there are those who are playing politics with the country`s lifeline. This continued malfeasance and dishonesty is a stark testament of politicians bereft of any iota of morality. That is why they have ganged up to construct a reality based on lies. In fact, tale tellers have it that they are even ferrying people from elsewhere to camp on the fringes of the Mau to give an impression to the whole world of the worst form of a government sponsored humanitarian crisis. And from the look of things they are really riding high on a carefully orchestrated political rollercoaster.

Even though they have constantly had their snouts bashed by the right thinking public they are not just ready to give up their deceit. They are the men and women of “great common sense and good taste.” They are not so much interested in being on the right side of history but would rather let opportunism drive them to boring ordinariness in their quest to ascend to the helm of the country`s political leadership in 2012. You have witnessed them snuggle in the guise of a fundraiser. And I also hear that that there are a series of rallies lined up just to denounce the evictions and to slander and vilify their perceived political nemesis. Going back to the fundraiser, I must not hesitate to point out that there is nothing wrong in organizing for a fundraiser to help genuine evictees. However, there is everything wrong in using the fundraiser as a perfect smokescreen for the launching of a neo Ku Klux Klan (commonly referred to as triple K alliance).

Much as I am encouraged by their sudden bout of philanthropy, I am still struggling very hard to understand why majority of the organizers of this fundraiser never shed a single tear for the victims of the Post Election Violence who are to date landless and homeless. Didn`t they not have children, women and the octogenarians sleeping in the biting cold? Did the organizers of this fundraiser demand for humane treatment of the IDPs as they are now doing for the Mau Complex illegal settlers? The Mau evictees and the IDPs aside, do these politicians give a hoot to the startling statistics of the landless and homeless in all the four corners of Kenya? Not even a cent has ever been extended to them. Did I hear someone shout subterfuge?

It is the duty of the mainstream media to make these facts stubborn. The media must continually air drop these facts in the current stream of the public`s conscience. Never must the public be oblivious to the history of the degazetment and systematic excision of the Mau complex and the political machination behind the importation of a human shield to protect the politically correct land lords of the Mau complex. If anything it is the yesterday`s oligarchy that must be prosecuted and forced to compensate the illegal settlers of the Mau. It is time they stopped politicking and faced the reality.

Most importantly, the intensifying rhetoric on the Mau eviction exercise must cease. This is because it does not bode well with the post election violence (PEV) conciliatory climate especially in the expansive Rift Valley region. In this rhetoric is a veneer of retaliatory attacks aimed at purging of the Rift Valley off “other ethnic communities.” They want to once more rouse the dreaded monster of negative ethnicity. Political leaders must understand that fear mongering in the guise of political supremacy battles is far from being patriotic.

If they really want the public to believe that parliament and cabinet had agreed on compensating or giving alternative land to the illegal settlers, then, why not urgently convene a cabinet meeting and thrush out misunderstandings on the eviction exercise rather than engage in the protracted poisonous rhetoric? As for the MPs, isn`t the floor of the August House where they are supposed to put the government to task for reneging on such a substantive agreement? Or are they permanently incapable of making sense on the floor of the House? I suspect that the reason why these politicians do not want to engage in reasonable discourses on the floor of the August House is because they know that they are simply politicisizing that which they themselves participated in legislating. Kenyans are increasingly dismayed especially by the preposterous behavior of Cabinet ministers who overstep acknowledged protocol of collective responsibility to criticize the policies and decisions ratified in cabinet meetings. This only lends credence to their sinister motives. The two principals must crack the whip now before it is too late. Now than ever before, the country desires President Kibaki`s silence to be broken, at least on the Mau issue.

TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

THE MAU ULTIMATUM: THE CITIZENRY MUST DENOUNCE ETHNO-POLITICAL SHENANIGANS.

Dear Sir/Madam,
“Conscience ought to be a mirror before which one pinches himself.” Today, this aphorism would mesh well in any other society but Kenya. Majority of our politicians are made of a different mettle. To them “conscience” at the very least, must be expunged from the Kenyan political dictionary. This is what Taban Lo Liyong would term as “lexicographicide”. Our politicians are very comfortable purveying untruths; they seek to obfuscate Kenya`s legitimate rights to a conducive socio-economic and political environment. I keep on hoping that there will be a small secret voice that will just whisper in their conscience, “You are a fraud”. How they spin lies ad infinitum without butting their eyelids is just amazing! But that is not all. Any conscientious person seen to be an obstacle in their quest to advance their selfish interests must also be thoroughly slandered.

In the words of Lillian Hellman “truth made you a traitor as it often does in a time of scoundrels.” Her words lend a sharp poignancy and insight in the Kenyan political landscape. Admittedly, our politicians have robbed off politics any decency. Deceit is the new buzzword. For instance, after the KTN expose’, no one can believe the claptrap being bandied around about the Prime Minister having issued a directive to purge the evictees off the fringes of the Mau Complex in the ungodly hours of the night. This is another of the so many and not so well crafted lies that keep on flying- apart before the right thinking public. The unfortunate thing about lying is that you have to tenaciously, viscerally and perhaps unflinchingly, manufacture in quick succession, three times the lies you spewed yesterday to give them some semblance of truth today.
In their desperation to lie they pay no attention to the rules of logic that would otherwise guard them against pitfalls. It is precisely at this unguarded moment that the “liar” in them shines as bright as the equatorial midday. Political corruption, patronage and impunity are instruments that perfect their political con game. That is why even with the melodrama that ranged from the sublime of the legislators` crocodile tears to the ridiculous personality-slandering, the public has finally learnt to spot their shenanigans.
The bitter truth is that the illegal Mau settlers are only but mere pawns for the peers of the realm in the Mau Complex saga. This is because after annexing huge chunks of land in the Mau complex, they came up with ethnic mischief which sought to literally “import” gullible Kenyans from Kericho, Bomet and Baringo and put them in the Mau to act as an ethnic shield against any future threats of evictions from successive regimes. Anytime eviction talk is rife, the “Real landlords” of the Mau Complex troop en masse to their ethnic enclave. We must, as a peace loving nation, denounce these political shenanigans. They have brought nothing but dishonor and disrepute to our country. There must be no room for this political perfidy.
It is not lost to all that the combined acreage of the illegal settlers is a trifling compared to the over 50,000 acres of land in the hands of the “real encroachers” whose names are in the” who is who” list of Kenyan politics. With this fact in mind you can then begin to appreciate the real fear behind the façade of the Mau aristocrats if perchance this human shield was to be removed.

It is time that these plunderers faced the consequences of their sins of commission and omission. That is why I find their “Two Weeks Ultimatum Talk” quite unpalatable. This melodrama is a stark testament to political irrationality. The country can no longer afford to expose Kenyans to this inanity and ethno-political overtones. Unless they issued this ultimatum against themselves then they have no moral authority to purport to speak for a people they themselves have subjected to deceit for decades.
TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

IS THERE SABOTAGE IN THE MAU COMPLEX EVICTIONS?

Dear Sir/Madam,
Apparently no one can compute the “unestimated sum of human suffering that the Mau complex evictees are undergoing. It looks as if the Government is cold hearted and callous towards its own people or that it seriously underestimated the humanitarian crisis that was likely to emerge. Still it may be that some politicians are out to create the impression that the Government never cared to plan for the evictions at all. I find it difficult to believe that the Government can become a savage to its own people. Going by the sentiments of the chairperson of The Mau Task Force, the Ministries of water, security and special programmes ought to have been on the ground complimenting the eviction exercise. But they are conspicuously missing in action.
So to me the only plausible reason would that the exercise has been reduced to a political ping pong with a view to using the illegal settlers as a smokescreen. Any Tom, Dick and Harry knows that this exercise bears all the hallmarks of political sabotage. But is this sabotage is likely to affect the country more than the individual(s) targeted? Social and economic prospects are more at risk than an individual`s political ambitions. A section of Rift Valley legislators, believe that the PM is out to create a humanitarian crisis to gain a global platform in Copenhagen climate talks. At the moment there is a barrage of condemnation and vitriol most foul leveled against the person of the PM. In fact it has now belatedly dawned on a section of the Rift Valley MPs that the PM is a pretender to the throne! This reaction was not unexpected since the issue was bound to bring about the shifting political alliances. You see, politicians like love and hatred, are two sides of the same coin.
I do not think the PM is so naïve as to connive to drive illegal settlers from the forest and to become mince meat to his political archenemies. He cannot be so naïve as to loose such a huge and vital voting block in the Rift Valley! That is why I smell a rat. Could it be that there is sabotage? Taletellers allege that a section of the Rift valley legislators are out to deride the eviction exercise and make it appear the worst form of a humanitarian crisis ever witnessed in Kenya. In fact, in their own words, the 2007 post election IDP crisis will be pale a shadow compared to it! That is why they have gone ahead to tell “their” people not to move an inch from the perimeter fence of the Mau complex in order to proclaim to the whole world how wicked the government is to their people!
Is it not pretentious for the MPs to raise the issue of compensation for a people who acquired the forest land illegally? Illegal settlers have over time been evicted in Mt. Kenya, Mt.Elgon and Embobut in Marakwet without compensation. The thinking seems to be that since the government is buying land for the internally displaced victims of post election violence so must it buy land for the illegal settlers evicted from the Mau forest. But what these politicians are not telling us is that they are the very ones who allowed these people into the forest to act as a shield against themselves and those who bought illegal land from their dubious companies. Alluding to compensation will be akin to legitimizing a wrong. We must not allow politicians to institutionalize this problem because in the words of Nikki Giovanni (1943), a US activist, writer and educationist “once you institutionalize a problem, then you do not intent to solve it.”
However, it is the melodrama surrounding the MPs that has pundits pondering. To some it is first aimed sanitizing the cyclic post election violence in the region and secondly to force the Government to abandon the noble rehabilitation of the country`s forest cover. If indeed this is the reality then it is quite repulsive and unacceptable. The country must not give into this mind numbing political gimmicks. It is unimaginable, obnoxious, cold and callous for the” real Land Lords” of the Mau complex to use the hapless illegal settlers as a smokescreen to perpetuate their selfish interests.
This noble eviction exercise must continue for to sabotage it, or to fritter will bring upon us all the reproaches of the after time.
TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

SIMPLIFIED CURRICULA: CONTRADICTORY DIRECTIVES ARE A TESTAMENT TO LACK OF CONSULTATION.

Dear Sir/Madam,
Recent reports from sections of the media that KNEC and KIE have issued contradictory directives with regard to the implementation of the simplified mathematics and science curricula, is a testament to the deep seated problems ailing the education system in Kenya: lack of both a solid research base and consultation. Whereas KIE insists that the package is optional for students, KNEC has made it mandatory for schools to only take one of the packages. This confusion paints a very bad picture of the two organs that are supposed to compliment each other. They seem not to realize that the problem associated with the development, operation and improvement of any educational system must be based on extensive and systematic applications of knowledge. Moreover it must be an all inclusive and participatory process. But in Kenya this seems to be far from the truth. The left hand hardly knows what the right hand is up to.
Much as we hope that the confusion will be done away with, I still have a problem with this general science “thing”. It is ostensibly formulated for students whose interest and aptitude is not in pursuing courses that require high competence in pure sciences. Prima facie, this sounds a great policy directive. However, the devil lies in the details. A good curriculum ought not to be discriminative and must play a significant role in human resource development and placement. But looking at it from all angles, this curriculum bears the hallmarks of the Government`s discrimination against the less fortunate members in the country. Why do I say so?
This is because it is a known fact that performance in examinations differ in such a way that students from the higher socio-economic schools demonstrate a higher performance. Obviously the educational production process in such schools enjoys sufficient resources. Since the dregs (and who constitute the majority) of the society do not have access to such schools, they have to pursue their education in ill equipped village schools that can only offer general science curricula.
In my opinion it appears as if the Government is admitting its failure in addressing issues relating to access, equity and quality of education across the social divide as was promised in the Sessional paper no.1 of 2005. Under a targeted programme the Government was supposed to rehabilitate and provide laboratory equipment in schools in the rural and marginalized areas in a bid to address regional disparities. Admittedly, the programme is a cropper. Consequently, the Government seems to be suggesting that students from disadvantaged schools will never become engineers and doctors, and by all indications, it will be sending a strong message to the public that students from disadvantaged schools are lesser citizens than their counterparts. It is precisely because of the threat to validity and equity that saw the Government phase out such a similar curriculum in the nineties. Then we used to have pure and biological sciences.
Much as we all agree that the acute inequalities in schools in the country have over the years made it impossible for the construction of a consistent, reliable and valid performance measurement, but should that be a ground for the entrenching of a discriminatory and retrogressive curriculum change? Certainly not. Two wrongs do not make a right. I am extremely afraid that the complacency now setting in is both foolish and dangerous.
What good will it do to a learner/teacher whose interest is in learning/teaching pure sciences or pure mathematics but who is forced by the school management due to unavailability of resources to only learn/teach the general sciences or simplified mathematics? From the foregoing, the question shouldn’t be whether the Government can afford to do more to promote social mobility. It should be whether Government can afford not to. And the answer is no.
TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA.

PARTY STALWARTS AGAINST REAL DEVOLUTION BESMIRCH PUBLIC INTELLECT.

Dear Sir/Madam,
The makers of our constitution at the time of our country`s independence did not intend to preserve an unchanging society, but instead meant the constitution to invariably adapt to the needs of our dynamic society. Even though the independence constitution gave the president a carte blanche to run the nation as he deemed fit, experience has shown that such unfettered powers are often misused. The president like a deity became omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. There are many among us today who bear the scars of this tyranny. In fact the protracted fight for the second liberation was informed by the dictatorial tendencies that the right thinking public saw in the leadership of president Moi and his predecessor. Devolvement of the powers vested in the presidency and its usual appurtenances was then the buzz word. Apparently when president Kibaki came to the helm of leadership, those close to the pedestal of power changed tact. They wanted to maintain the status quo. Even after the post election violence, they do not want to hear anything about a constitutional dispensation that cuts a swath through the imperial presidency.
They prophetically harp on the existence of a constitutional crisis if executive power is shared between the presidency and the Prime Minister (Parliament). This pretence besmirches the intellect of Kenyans. Our reaction to these inanities is not amusement but bafflement, verging on rage. These can only be politicians who are out to have Kenya stop being a democracy in any meaningful sense. That is why they are too busy furthering their selfish interests at the country`s expense. In the words of Barry Goldwater, a 1964 Republican Party candidate, “Those who seek absolute power even though they seek it to do what they regard as good, are simply demanding the right to enforce their own version of heaven on earth. And let me remind you, they are the very ones who always create the most hellish tyrannies. Absolute power does corrupt, and those who seek it must be suspect and must be opposed.”
Rather than think of that which is best suited for the country they are busy throwing spanners in the works of the constitutional making process. And their best arsenal is of course to impiously force the country in to a horrendous political ping pong. It is this execrable behavior that engendered the hostilities that plunged this country in to a near holocaust. Yet the same politicians unashamedly elect to deliberately ignore this fact. Mao Tse Tung (1893-1976) said that “Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed.” There is a very thin line between the two so much so that it only requires the snafus and preposterous verboten to trigger an unprecedented bloodletting. Of course you and I know that our politicians have plenty of these in stock. Sad as it is, they have already set the tempo. And our hopes of having a new constitutional dispensation can only dissipate.
Should we stand aside helplessly, gnashing our teeth, as a section of our politicians line up to deride the efforts of the Committee of Experts (CoE) just as they did with Constitution of Kenya Review Commission (CKRC) in 2005? We cannot allow this to happen again. It is first and foremost our peace as a country that is at stake. Secondly it is our tax billions that will yet again go to waste. My exhortation is to patriotic Kenyans is this: We must stand up and say no to these political machinations. So don't just sit there moaning about how the country's going to the dogs. Sign up and let's kick some ass.
TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

PARTY STALWARTS AGAINST REAL DEVOLUTION BESMIRCH PUBLIC INTELLECT.

Dear Sir/Madam,
The makers of our constitution at the time of our country`s independence did not intend to preserve an unchanging society, but instead meant the constitution to invariably adapt to the needs of our dynamic society. Even though the independence constitution gave the president a carte blanche to run the nation as he deemed fit, experience has shown that such unfettered powers are often misused. The president like a deity became omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. There are many among us today who bear the scars of this tyranny. In fact the protracted fight for the second liberation was informed by the dictatorial tendencies that the right thinking public saw in the leadership of president Moi and his predecessor. Devolvement of the powers vested in the presidency and its usual appurtenances was then the buzz word. Apparently when president Kibaki came to the helm of leadership, those close to the pedestal of power changed tact. They wanted to maintain the status quo. Even after the post election violence, they do not even want to hear anything about a constitutional dispensation that cuts a swath through the imperial presidency.
They prophetically harp on the existence of a constitutional crisis if executive power is shared between the presidency and the Prime Minister (Parliament). This pretence besmirches the intellect of Kenyans. Our reaction to these inanities is not amusement but bafflement, verging on rage. These can only be politicians who are out to have Kenya stop being a democracy in any meaningful sense. That is why they are too busy furthering their selfish interests at the country`s expense. In the words of Barry Goldwater, a 1964 Republican Party candidate, “Those who seek absolute power even though they seek it to do what they regard as good, are simply demanding the right to enforce their own version of heaven on earth. And let me remind you, they are the very ones who always create the most hellish tyrannies. Absolute power does corrupt, and those who seek it must be suspect and must be opposed.”
Rather than think of that which is best suited for the country some they are busy throwing spanners in the works in the constitutional making process. And their best arsenal is of course to impiously force the country in to a horrendous political ping pong. It is this execrable behavior that engendered the hostilities that plunged this country in to a near holocaust. Yet the same politicians unashamedly elect to deliberately ignore this fact. Mao Tse Tung (1893-1976) said that “Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed.” There is a very thin line between the two so much so that it only requires the snafus and preposterous verboten to trigger an unprecedented bloodletting. Of course you and I know that our politicians have plenty of this in stock. Sad as it is, they have already set the tempo. And our hopes of having a new constitutional dispensation can only dissipate.
Should we stand aside helplessly, gnashing our teeth, as a section of our politicians line up to deride the efforts of the Committee of Experts (CoE) just as they did with Constitution of Kenya Review Committee (CKRC) in 2005? We cannot allow this to happen again. It is first and foremost our peace as a country that is at stake. Secondly it is our tax billions that will yet again go to waste. My exhortation is to patriotic Kenyans. We must stand up and say no to these political machinations. So don't just sit there moaning about how the country's going to the dogs. Sign up and let's kick some ass.
TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

THE QUEST FOR A LOCAL TRIBUNAL RUINED BY THE EXECUTIVE`S HOCUS POCUS.

Dear Sir/Madam,
What is this much hyped Ministers` and Assistant Ministers` Grand Retreat? Could it be that it is the Grand Coalition`s way of retreating from tackling the sizzling Imanyara Bill? Honorable Imanyara believes it is sabotage. So do I. This is because this government had plenty of time to organize for bonding sessions during the just concluded recess. Now that parliament has reconvened and with its in tray full with extremely urgent legislation, the executive sees this as a perfect opportunity for “them” to gobble chicken and chicanery in Mombasa.
Weirdly unfamiliar it may be, but certainly not entirely unexpected. Eugene McCarthy (1916-2005), once a US senator said that “politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think that it is important”. I cannot agree more with him. This is because after many days of indecision, discussion and procrastination, there seems to be no glimmer of hope that Kenya`s Parliament will be sufficiently philanthropic as to establish a local tribunal to complement the ICC. With their eyes ravenously focused on 2012 it is hardly surprising that political machinations have yet again started overriding the national interests. They have no doubt adopted the “see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil” stance. Using this lenses, it becomes crystal clear to all and sundry that the executive`s bonding session is all about its collective desire to evenly cover its muck.
In their quest to ascend to the helm of the country`s leadership they conveniently forget that the price of greatness is responsibility and not irresponsibility. Their body language is reminiscent of the then US president Ronald Reagan who unable to deal with the biting deficit quipped “I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself.” Like Reagan our politicians scamper at the sight of impunity while fervently hoping that it (impunity) is big enough to take care of itself! And with this kind of obnoxious attitude I have no iota of doubt that Kenya shall continue to greatly suffer the consequences of the criminalization of politics in the successive electioneering periods courtesy of the verbal snafus and preposterous sound bytes of the high and mighty.
They care less whether their mumbo-jumbo can engender a holocaust. That is why at one time they blubber “Don`t be vague, go to Hague.” And in quick succession, they mumble about the establishment of a “local tribunal” then to “Reconciliation without Truth and Justice.” Putting their foot in their mouth or goofing as is commonly known is ostensibly our politicians` way of life. Admittedly many of them just bungle up to gain publicity. (But this not to say that there are those among them who are permanently incapable of speaking sense). They unashamedly engage in hocus-pocus while fervently hoping that the resultant avalanche of confusion will snuff out the nation`s quest for justice. They have conveniently forgotten that it is their unrepentant mood that has over the years resulted in the institutionalization of impunity.
However, for the victims of post election violence, know thee that all is not lost. The wheels of justice may appear to be slow but they shall surely catch up with these Lords of impunity. They may desperately attempt to cover their nakedness with “sovereignty” but not for long. This is because the will of the over 40 million Kenyans shall ultimately triumph.
TOME FRANCIS,
BUMULA CONSTITUENCY.

WHO WILL SAVE KENYA FROM THE NAPOLEONS OF CORRUPTION?

Dear Sir/Madam,
T S Elliot, a 1948 Nobel Prize winner in Literature wrote a poem titled “Macavity –The Mystery cat.” Macavity was described as having a hidden paw, having the movement of a snake and a criminal who used his intellect to defy the law. He was bafflement to Scotland Yard and caused constant despair to the Flying Squad; for when they reached the scene of the crime, Macavity was simply not there. This was suavity and deceitfulness par excellence. He always had an alibi and spared one or two more alibis just in case they came in handy. He was outwardly respectable in spite of being a Napoleon of corruption, the crème de la crème. It was therefore not surprising that his footsteps could not be found in any file of the Scotland Yard.
Today, the fictitious Macavity has acquired life. He is alive and kicking in Kenya. He is not one. There are many. The edacious Macavity are more emboldened in the perpetuation of noxious graft as they are equipped with impunity. They are often surrounded with the exquisite Harvard legalese. They are not in the same league with the pusillanimous. They are true master minds of crime, the fat cats who supervise the pillaging of public coffers on grand scales.
You have heard the ravenous Macavity spin legal webs in defense of the well executed schemes that led to loss of billions of shillings in the Golden Berg, Anglo leasing, Grand Regency and the porous Kenya Pipeline Company (KPC). You recently heard of him in the ministry of Youth Affairs, Ministry of water, you have seen him in the Ministry of basic Education (remember the 109 million in a mysterious account?) And now he has surfaced in the Ministry of finance; in the infamous Passat deal. And the list goes on ad infinitum.
It is rumored that all the voracious cats whose wicked deeds are widely known are nothing more than agents of these Napoleons of crime. Are we not almost certain that when the pilferage has taken place blame for the scandal is always heaped on junior officers? When the subordinates are nabbed, which isn't often, there is no evidence linking the crimes to the masters. The master mind of crime is the mysterious "Macavity” who plans the crimes that lesser criminals execute.
With alacrity unmatched, these master minds in cahoots with senior officers have methodically sealed all the possible avenues for the unraveling of the scandals. Their rendition always almost made us believe that there was no iota of evidence to warrant prosecutions. Of course you and I were so sure that the Ministerial statements read in parliament in the wake of the scandals were as clear as mud.
Just who will save Kenya from the litany of grand scams; from the avaricious clutches of these Napoleons of corruption?

COOPERATION WITH ICC: THIS MUMBO-JUMBO SOVEREIGNTY BALDERDASH MUST CEASE.

Dear Sir/Madam,
Perhaps the missile code named Grand Coalition Government (GCG) auto –destructed itself after its much hyped failed launch. It set out to navigate the judicial path of Post Election Violence (PEV) and implement essential reforms commonly referred to as “agenda four” with more bravado than common sense. Now everything is at a stand still yet the clock is fast ticking. All indications are that we are heading into a Cimmerian darkness. Even though the Grand Coalition Government keeps on reassuring Kenyans that it is committed to fighting impunity, one cannot fail to see impunity`s usual appurtenances. Kenyans are now dog tired of this ridiculous jiggery- pokery going behind their backs. Everyone right from the government functionaries seems to have been given a carte blanche to speak as he or she desires to. And the result is there for everyone to see. An avalanche of confusion seems to be suffocating the GCG`s operations.
That is why Kenya`s foreign affairs Permanent Secretary; Thuita Mwangi easily adopted a very blinkered attitude of the conscientious public and then belligerently arrogated himself the power to pen down balderdash in one of the leading local dailies on the eve of the ICC prosecutor, Luis Moreno Ocampo`s visit in the country. In fact, Thuita only stopped short of declaring Ocampo a persona non grata in this country. This is obviously a case of engaging in a two penny theatrics on issues touching on the heartbeat of the nation.
The two principals on reading the mood of the public ostensibly castigated Thuita for the impermissible conduct. Yet, a day later when the two met the ICC prosecutor, their body language was no different from Thuita`s. Beneath their well coded diplomatic verbiage was a tacit message to Ocampo and by extension the international community that Kenya was a sovereign state able to deal with its own internal problems without external interference. Now this is ad hominem par excellence. Like Thuita the two principals must be told that anybody perceived to be standing in the way of justice is an enemy of public conscience.
Thinking of using a special wing of the high court that reeks with impunity to try suspected perpetrators of PEV is ad nauseum. It will be chimerical. This will be chicanery most foul. It will no doubt be interpreted by the post election victims as an attempt to defenestrate justice and pamper the afreet of impunity. The time for bread and circuses is out. The two principals seem to be working at cross purposes with the conscientious public.
We must stop behaving as though we are a people suffering from borderline personality disorder. Parliament made a resounding decision. “Let us not be vague, let us go to Hague”. So be it. This genie of impunity that keeps on rearing its ugly head ad infinitum must be put back in the bottle once and for all. Why backpedal and embellish incendiarism? It will be in our best interest as a country if we ceased beguiling ourselves with abrogation talk. Such talks will amount to nothing because ICC has no abandonment option. Kenya is now ICC`s captive customer. My exhortation to his Excellency the President and the right honorable Prime Minister is not to allow our beloved country to be held captive by the mumbo-jumbo sovereignty balderdash.